HKDSE M2 Question Review (20250615)

校園
#51 Antibabypillen
31/07/25 19:00

Question 17: Explain why the leading coefficient of a polynomial cannot be zero.

#52 Antibabypillen
31/07/25 19:07

Solution:

The leading coefficient of a polynomial f(x)can be rewritten as the amplitude of a polynomial, i.e.:

f(x) = a (f(x)/a) = a g(x)

Put a = 0, then g(x) will be undefined.

Even without factor out the amplitude a, just recall a fact that for any number n:

0 • n = 0

The value of n cannot be zero.

Now put n=f(x), then f(x) cannot be zero and thus have no root such that it can no longer be a polynomial by the fundamental theorem of algebra, i.e. no degree at all.

Even if you argue that f(x) of even order can have complex roots, you will face the inequalities f(x) > 0 or f(x) < 0. So if you atempt to extract the complex roots, you will be comparing complex numbers which is nonsense.

#53 Antibabypillen
31/07/25 19:09

Even if you argue that f(x) of even degrees can have complex roots, you will face the inequalities f(x) > 0 or f(x) < 0. So if you attempt to extract the complex roots, you will be comparing complex numbers which is nonsense.

#54 Antibabypillen
31/07/25 19:10

Even without factoring out the amplitude a, just recall a fact that for any number n:

0 • n = 0

#55 Antibabypillen
31/07/25 19:13

Try writing f(x) = x^2 + 1 <0,

if you attempt to extract the comple x roots:

-i < x < i

You will be comparing non-real values dude. Remember inequalities can be used to compare real numbers only.

#56 Antibabypillen
31/07/25 19:17

By the same token, if y=mx + c

y is a polynomial of degree 1 if and only if the leading coefficient m is non-zero, otherwise we have 2 cases that defy the fundamental theorem of algebra that a polynomial of n degrees have exactly n roots:

Case 1: m = 0

Then y has no roots (y=c and c is non-zero real number) or infinite roots (y=0)

Case 2: m=infinity

Consider the inverse of y=c, i.e. x=c, the reasoning is similar to case 1.

#57 傷仲永
05/08/25 00:29

Question 18:

Given -2 ≤ x ≤ 1, the following function has the maximum value 4:

y = - ( x - m)^2 + m^2 + 1

Find the value(s) of m.

#58 傷仲永
05/08/25 00:37

Solution:

The vertex is (m, m^2 + 1).

Since the leading coefficient is negative, the vertex represents global maximum.

The axis of symmetry is x=m.

Here are 3 cases:

Case 1: m < -2

Then y is maximum when x = -2

m = -7/4 > -2

This case is rejected.

Case 2: -2≤m≤1

Then y is maximun when x = m

i.e. m^2 + 1 = 4

m = √3 or -√3

We reject √3 as √3 > 1.

Case 3: m > 1

Then y is maximum when x = 1

m = 2

So the answer is 2 or -√3.

#59 傷仲永
05/08/25 00:42

BTW,

DSE Core Math = 大陸中考

So if you notice this publication:

You will soon figure out its source:

天下文章一大抄

#60 傷仲永
05/08/25 00:44

More example:

Its source:

HKDSE is MK Behavior then.

#61 老而不死是為逆賊
10/08/25 00:51

Question 19:

Solve 1/x > -2

#62 老而不死是為逆賊
10/08/25 00:52

Question 19:

Solve 1/x > -2

Some will say:

-1 > -2x

1 < 2x

x >1/2

Is it valid?

#63 老而不死是為逆賊
10/08/25 00:56

Solution:

We don't know the sign of x,

to keep both side having the signs intact,

we do the following trick:

1/x • x^2 > -2 • x^2

x > -2 x^2

2x^2 > -x

2x^2 + x > 0

x(2x+1) >0

x< -1/2 or x >0

#64 老而不死是為逆賊
10/08/25 01:02

Alternatively, take cases.

Case 1: x=0

Go fuck yourself.

The expression is undefined then.

Case 1: x > 0

1 > -2x

2x > -1

x > -1/2

Notice that x > 0 > -1/2

Combining 2 inequality above using AND,

we have x > 0

Case 2: x< 0

1 < -2x

x < -1/2

Notice that x < -1/2 < 0

Combining 2 inequality above using AND,

we have x < -1/2

本主題共有 64 則回覆,第 2 頁。