又有行家突個龜頭出嚟
睇嚟大陸學制嘅吸引力已經超越DSE
一睇就知係2023最後一屆大陸高考理科數學試題
2024新高考連Linear Programming 都唔駛考
新不如舊
BTW, 試下用DSE程度數學做上述題目
一睇就知係2023最後一屆大陸高考理科數學試題
2024新高考連Linear Programming 都唔駛考
新不如舊
BTW, 試下用DSE程度數學做上述題目
提示:
Solution
We try to compare 2 sides:
LHS: x (e^x -1)
RHS: 1+ ln(x)(x+1) - 2x
Given x>0, then x^2 >0
Divide both sides by x^2 won't affect the sign of both LHS and RHS
Now LHS= (e^x -1)/x
RHS = (1+ ln(x)(x+1) - 2x)/x^2
Take limit on both side as x--> 0+
Then LHS= 1
Since deg(ln(x))=0, deg(RHS) <0
Now RHS = -∞ without using L'Hospital Rule
Clearly, LHS > RHS
QED
一睇就知係2023最後一屆大陸高考理科數學試題
2024新高考連Linear Programming 都唔駛考
新不如舊
BTW, 試下用DSE程度數學做上述題目
類似問題成日喺度翻炒:
Given f(x) = e^x/ax - b and g(x) = ax/ln(x) - b.
Both functions have the same minmum.
(a) Compute a.
(b) Prove that if f(x) and g(x) have 4 roots x_n,
where x_1 < x_2 < x_3 < x_4,
then x_1‧ x_4 = x_2 ‧ x_3
今晚放假, 順手寫埋答案
Solution:
(a)
f'(x) =[e^x (x-1)]/ax^2
and g'(x) = [a (ln(x)-1)]/(ln(x))^2
f'(1) = 0
and g'(e) = 0
Now f(1) = e/a - b
and g(e) = ae - b
Note that a is a leading coefficient.
Now e/a = ae
Then a = 1 or -1
By noticing the domains of both functions, and using the property of rectangular hyperbola (y=1/x),
we can deduce the convexity without differentiating f'(x) and g'(x) or discussing monotonicity within the specified domains.
Since e^x/x is always convex for x>0, i.e. f"(1) >0,
and lnx/x is always convex for x>1, i.e. g"(e) > 0,
then a >0.
If a < 0 , only local maximum, not local minimum as given will be computed. So we will reject a = -1.
QED
(b)
Now, since the domain of g(x) >1 and that of f(x) >0, geometrically the roots of f(x) are x_1 and x_3, where the roots of g(x) are x_2 and x_4, because f(x)=g(x) has exactly 1 solution:
e^x/x = x/lnx
(e^x) (lnx) = x^2
Sinec e^x > x and lnx < x,
Then 1<x<e
Now e^x_1/x_1 = x_4/ ln(x_4)
and e^x_3/x_3 = x_2/ ln(x_2)
summarized as (*)
Also, since f(x) = g(e^x), we have:
f(x_1) = g(e^(x_1)) = g(x_2)
--> x_2 = e^(x_1)
and
f(x_3) = g(e^(x_3)) = g(x_4)
--> x_4 = e^(x_3)
summarized as (**)
By putting (**) into (*), we have:
x_2/ x_1 = e^(x_1) / x_1
= x_4 / ln(x_4) = x_4 / x_3
Rearranging the 4 roots, the result is obvious.
QED
基本上DSE係模仿緊大陸高考
CE 座標幾何題一定全部畫哂圖俾考生睇,
但DSE開始成題一幅圖都無要考生自己畫
轉數稍為慢啲好易答唔切
就算答得哂,都因為有一大堆爛數要爆,
考生一唔少心犯manipulation mistakes 就死得
DSE嘅趨勢就係鳩計
Core惟一考天份嘅課題得Combinatorics
至於M1同M2, 鳩計之餘又要鬥快運算
基本上唔太需要數學思維,
因此,部分大陸高考題目就咁睇比AL PMath更難,
但實際上只是將考生打造成人肉計數機而已
Solution
We try to compare 2 sides:
LHS: x (e^x -1)
RHS: 1+ ln(x)(x+1) - 2x
Given x>0, then x^2 >0
Divide both sides by x^2 won't affect the sign of both LHS and RHS
Now LHS= (e^x -1)/x
RHS = (1+ ln(x)(x+1) - 2x)/x^2
Take limit on both side as x--> 0+
Then LHS= 1
Since deg(ln(x))=0, deg(RHS) <0
Now RHS = -∞ without using L'Hospital Rule
Clearly, LHS > RHS
QED
RHS嘅進一步剖析:
留意 (1+lnx (x+1))/x^2
ln(0+) = -∞
For any finite a and b,
a ln(0) + b = -∞
喺RHS, a=1=b
個分母x^2永遠係正數,不影響分子嘅正負值
Also, 留意 -2x/x^2
-1/(0+) = 1/(0-) = -∞
Solution
We try to compare 2 sides:
LHS: x (e^x -1)
RHS: 1+ ln(x)(x+1) - 2x
Given x>0, then x^2 >0
Divide both sides by x^2 won't affect the sign of both LHS and RHS
Now LHS= (e^x -1)/x
RHS = (1+ ln(x)(x+1) - 2x)/x^2
Take limit on both side as x--> 0+
Then LHS= 1
Since deg(ln(x))=0, deg(RHS) <0
Now RHS = -∞ without using L'Hospital Rule
Clearly, LHS > RHS
QED
RHS嘅進一步剖析:
留意 (1+lnx (x+1))/x^2
ln(0+) = -∞
For any finite a and b,
a ln(0) + b = -∞
喺RHS, a=1=b
個分母x^2永遠係正數,不影響分子嘅正負值
Also, 留意 -2x/x^2
-1/(0+) = 1/(0-) = -∞
-∞/(0+)^2
= +∞ / -(0+)^2
Notice a/(-x^2) for a>0:
Consider -1/x^2,
when x-> 0+, -∞ will be guaranteed
Then consider a=+∞,
We know that 正負得負,
So (+∞)(-∞)=-∞
Solution
We try to compare 2 sides:
LHS: x (e^x -1)
RHS: 1+ ln(x)(x+1) - 2x
Given x>0, then x^2 >0
Divide both sides by x^2 won't affect the sign of both LHS and RHS
Now LHS= (e^x -1)/x
RHS = (1+ ln(x)(x+1) - 2x)/x^2
Take limit on both side as x--> 0+
Then LHS= 1
Since deg(ln(x))=0, deg(RHS) <0
Now RHS = -∞ without using L'Hospital Rule
Clearly, LHS > RHS
QED
Note that LHS = d(e^x)/dx = e^x
Just recall the first principle.
Then we know that e^x is always convex and increasing from x=0.
From RHS, there is a local maxima (a, b)
Just prove that b < e^a.
Consider RHS, it is a concave function for x>0.
When x=1, RHS = -1
When x=e, RHS = 2-e> -1
Since RHS is still increasing for x>1,
we argue that a > 1.
So, ln(x) < x < x^2 for x >1
We now argue (1+ ln(x)(x+1) - 2x) < x^2
such that b = RHS <1 = e^x for all x >0
Now 1+ ln(x)(x+1) - 2x
< 1+x(x+1)-2x
< x^2 - x + 1 < x^2 -1 + 1 < x^2
as x >1
Hence, RHS <1
QED