睇下郊登支唔支援 tab 同 alignment
OJA STUDIES Lecture for Laymen
The Technical Analysis Framework (Part 1)
The Purpose of Technical Analysis Technical analysis is the deployment of external knowledge to extract useful information from the targeted system.
The difference between Technical analysis and fundamental analysis is that everyone can join the former while only investors will join the latter. Yet, the entry barrier of both analysis is high.
Technical analysis is speculative and investigative but no sexuality or any other kind of emotions will be projected on the targets. This implies technical analysis is rational in nature.
Orientations of Technical Analysis There are 2 orientations:
Input orientation: We get the impact from the target
Output Orientation: We impact the target
Input orientation can be further divided into 4 parts:
1. Issue Inquiry
2. Collection Server Discourse
3. Textual Analysis
4. Dynamic Synthesis
Orientations of Technical Analysis Output orientation can be further divided into four parts:
2. Sample Analysis
3. Flow Analysis
4. Ideological Applications
We deploy a lot of theories for both orientations and the outcomes are original researches. This implies that technical analysis can create theories for further academic purposes.
Issue Inquiry In causal judgment, we only have 2 options: true or false
For example, any false proposition implies true for any outcome. If I am God then I can kill anyone. The proposition is false such that we can draw any ridiculous conclusion that is always true as fictions. From this digital logic we can figure out which reality is.
In value judgment, we face infinite arrays of preferences
This implies that we will face conflicts and tradeoffs between stakeholders have to be made in order to cooperate and collaborate. Consent is often made with compromises.
Issue Inquiry Issue inquiry is both causal judgment and value judgment. Just like HKDSE Geography curriculum, we first have themes to learn the facts from an issue, then we learn the opinions from different stakeholders for possibilities, limitations and breakthroughs. Both critical thinking and rational thinking matter.
Even mathematics can have value judgment: We can argue whether throwing a dice is classical probability or Bayesian probability. Value judgment implies politics in life.
Issue Inquiry When confronting with an issue, we inevitably take side and suggest solutions to respond. Political correctness and concreteness is the key to a sound decision making.
We shall try to avoid making pseudo-solutions. For example, if we say we shall care the disabled, we lack the specifications. We shall further elaborate. For example, we shall suggest the government should spare more fundings on local rehabilitation services in order to motivate the disabled to participate in community services so as to boost the GDP by Keynesianism (progressive government expense) and safeguard our robust economy in the long run.
Technical Analysis can convert an infotainment to academia. So we can deploy issue inquiry on animes to excavate educational values on what laymen deed it low entertainment for sure.
For example, we shall argue whether all boys should read Ojamajo Doremi (A magic girl series). Some say the male audiences are feminine, but modern psychiatry maintains that boys are defective girls such that we shall educate a boy like educating a girl. In fact, the production is just home economics courses to children before puberty, as well as moral education courses to even adults.
Collection Server Discourse We know all females are MK and all parents are MK just because we know that otakus are all males that reluctant to reproduce die to their personality fused into their X chromosomes. Otakus are regarded as collectors. We observe that most of the collectors are male fans. In collection server discourse, we shall study their collector traits and induce what laymen should learn from their behaviours and contributions.
Collector is the parent set of mutually exclusive fans and otakus.
Collection Server Discourse Wikipedia is written by amateur collectors. There are no full time collectors as financial backups are required to support collection services. A good analyzer must be a good collector.
Otakus have decent vocations and their family have no criminal records, while most of the fans are rather juvenile and affluent.
Otakus will not project sexuality on their targets of collections but fans as Pure MK will. So fetishism is always spotted from fans.
Sorting is often found when collectors process their collections. This will engender their original researches.
For example, they will form cults from GitHub, Wordpress or Patreon. They also have Whatsapp Groups, Telegram channels and so on in order to collect information they need to analyze.
They will set up Wikia or publish books to serve readers with collection outcomes. Fans will advocate their claims via existent human relationship hegemony while otakus will integrate their collection services in daily life to form collection philosophy.
Collection Server Discourse In anime system, fans form Doujin culture where no otakus will join it. Fans will target at MK by forming small circuits, while otakus could only broadcast individually. A Doujin CG author (e.g. the original author of K-On! ) is not necessarily a Doujin culture advocate because his production never projects sexuality. In fact, he considers the female protagonists stupid so no crush is found from the plot. Being able to provide birth information on ACG characters implies that the author is an amateur astrologer.
Textual Analysis It is the study of the texture of a collection. Texture determines the value judgment a collector holds.
ACG fans often fetish on female characters, so their collection will often exhibit Lolita fashion, uniform and even Mary Jane Shoes. Different from Pro-MK, fans as Pure MK has stable sexuality and will not form sexual minority (LGBTQ). Although otakus think and feel like mature women, they will not turn on sexuality as they discredit any sort of relationships.
Textual Analysis Autism is often found in fans. Their preferred textures often have repetitive features and they call it moe characters (萌屬性).
Unlike Pro-MK, all collectors will not exhibit homosexuality. But ironically, fans and Pro-MK are allies. Therefore, BL or GL elements Doujin culture serves are always of falsehood.
Otakus are frank and righteous and they cannot stand hypocrisy, so social issues and criminal justice are common themes they like. They are more able than fans to communicate with reality. z
What is the difference when collectors serve Lolita fashion?
Fans will make it sexually explicit.
Otakus will make it elegant.
What will collectors treat women fashion?
Fans will consider it a source of masturbation
Otakus will consider it human stupidity (especially on JK fashion)
Basically otakus are questing for both business values and educational values by exercising originality of their production.
Textual Analysis Fans are specialist while otakus are generalist, so the latter will demonstrate a spectrum of common interests on his collections
In terms of pedagogy, a Chemistry fan will not focus on Biology topics like genetics, but a Pure Math otaku will have a lot of Chinese Literature references in order to show his omniphile traits.
Fans love simulacra so basically we can call all Pure MK schizophrenic. Otakus are rather straightforward so basically they prefer environmentalism (especially ecology) to postmodernism (especially parody and pastiche).
Dynamic Synthesis Before performing collection service, the stakeholders need to do survey, and adjust their service according to feedbacks.
TVB stops making Cantonese anime songs after a survey on local Fullmetal Alchemist audiences. The latter found the translation bad.
Unlike making a paper, collectors will not consider the survey a methodology of research. In fact, they adjust their consumption style, apart from production, by the survey.
The survey can be done by telephone interview, online questionnaire or simply spectator observation.
Dynamic Synthesis A married male MK is always Pure MK, and is omnipresent everywhere including even academia. These douchebags will try to use their specialist knowledge (especially sociology) to entertain reader on their collection service on ACG. This is sheer infotainment otakus always avoid.
What otakus do instead is using his specialist knowledge to attest another specialist knowledge originally. Evidence-based research is for Pure MK only. Otakus emphasize inspiration instead of “seeing is believing”.
Dynamic Synthesis Dynamic Synthesis implies that the production of a collector is the consumption of audience’s production. Audience simply supplies information to change collector’s collection service.
Fans seldom use external knowledge to justify another external knowledge. Instead, they use the plots from what ACG production they consume to create another plots, so their productions have grapevine information which hinders bystander from entry. So, fans are NEVER diverse and inclusive.
Dynamic Synthesis Otakus respect individual differences while fans as Pure MK never, therefore otakus need extensive readings from different media in other to undergo collection services to all walks of life.
For example, communist fans reject all kinds of religion, but we know that atheism is also a kind of religion. So communist otakus will try to open a new vision to amend existent communism such that all religions can be compatible with communist administration. A remarkable assertion made by otakus would be like “all different kinds of God boil down to the same origin: The nature.”
個rich text format editor同output完全係兩樣野